This past weekend Mitt Romney stated where he stands on what happened to Terri Schiavo, who's life was ended by euthanasia.
Romney believes "it's probably best to leave these kinds of matters in the hands of the courts. I generally think that it's not a good idea for courts to legislate. Nor is it a great idea for legislatures to adjudicate in a specific circumstance."
How can Romney be pro-euthanasia and really be pro-life? Both abortion and euthanasia end innocent lives and neither practice should occur.
Wednesday, March 14, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Visitors Since 9:16 PM EST. 12/11/2006:
free web counter
2 comments:
Romney is not pro-life. Not only does he support euthanasia, he would also allow abortion in the cases of rape and incest. We already knew he was too liberal even before this latest foolishness.
It's vital to know that euthanasia is a voluntary decision, and even though a doctor is allowed to end the life of someone, the patient is the one in charge of deciding that.
Post a Comment